Message from the 5th gen Camaro Team Options

[CrashTestDummy]

What issues is GM having with the 6L80 auto?

[poSSum]

Shift paddles, HUD, ???

This is the main problem. The Camaro may/may not be a nice car. But, when you are comparing it against a 4000lb, 4-door, touring car - there's something wrong. As I said in response to this post, the Camaro should be about the following words/sentiments: value, simple, horsepower, no-frills, good running gear, presence. It's not about being "comfortable" by having the latest in technology or interior materials.

I guess it's hard for them to see that when they could sell all the loaded to the gills V8 SS' they could build in '02 while base V6 and V8 cars rotted on the lots. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

[rpoz-29]

I don't like the size of those wheels. I saw a prototype at Lowes Motor Speedway a year ago, but couldn't get close enough to see inside. Like the exterior, except that the deck lid seems a little high. I'll withhold judgement until I see the interior in person. Either way, I hope the thing sells like crazy. GM needs all the help it can get.

This post has been edited by rpoz-29: Jul 25 2008, 09:07 PM

[00 Trans Ram]

Shift paddles, HUD, ???

This is the main problem. The Camaro may/may not be a nice car. But, when you are comparing it against a 4000lb, 4-door, touring car - there's something wrong. As I said in response to this post, the Camaro should be about the following words/sentiments: value, simple, horsepower, no-frills, good running gear, presence. It's not about being "comfortable" by having the latest in technology or interior materials.

I guess it's hard for them to see that when they could sell all the loaded to the gills V8 SS' they could build in '02 while base V6 and V8 cars rotted on the lots. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

True - heck, my 2000 Trans Am used to be loaded.