 So, I Was Pulling Up To A Light, |
|
|||||||||
  |
 Jul 14 2004, 04:32 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member  Group: Advanced Members Posts: 128 Joined: 17-March 04 From: Cleveland Member No.: 275  |
and the guy next to me is staring at the front of my car then waves at me and says "hey, do you know your front wheel is caved in?"
I chuckled and said, yeah, I did that on purpose, and he looks puzzled and says "oh yeah, cool" some people just don't understand camber p.s. -2.1/-2.0 IS a little excessive on the street, I know this, but its worth it! |
 |
 
|
|
Jul 14 2004, 04:33 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
FRRAX Owner/Admin Group: Admin Posts: 15,432 Joined: 13-February 04 From: Ohio Member No.: 196 |
(IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif)
That's funny. I only run -1.3 and it is visible. -2 is a "bunch", I'm suprised anyone noticed it though. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 14 2004, 04:47 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 128 Joined: 17-March 04 From: Cleveland Member No.: 275 |
I'll admit it looks a bit excessive sometimes,
with the ta fenders as exaggerated as they are, and the gw uppers pulling the front in some, instead of having the the lca come farther out to increase camber, then i can see some merit for what the guy said, it looks like something is wrong if you didnt know we adjust that on purpose. anyways, imo it looks great with the camber if it wasnt for the fenders sticking out that much farther than the wheel. guess i need 17x11's to fix that, I don't see myself going less than -1.5 camber in the future. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 14 2004, 05:45 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
CMCer Group: Moderators Posts: 2,932 Joined: 12-February 04 From: the sticks near VIR Member No.: 194 |
It's the low rider trucks with all the negative camber that freak me out! You wonder how could a full size Chevy be driving around like that! (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2004, 01:43 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 155 Joined: 18-April 04 From: Phoenix, Az. Member No.: 314 |
What's really sad is when you look at a lowered riced-out Civic and you're envious of the amount of negative camber they have.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2004, 02:02 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Video Clip God Group: Advanced Members Posts: 155 Joined: 7-January 04 From: Ontario Member No.: 105 |
exact same thing happened to me about 2wks ago right before I was about to drive 3hrs across the border(freaked me out for a split second). Guy in a truck pulled up beside me at the lights and said my wheel was wobbling. I just smiled and said it just looks like that. We went from the lights and the guy watched, then just smiled and gave me the thumbs up.
I have -1* of camber |
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2004, 02:29 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Apex? What apex? Group: Advanced Members Posts: 245 Joined: 7-January 04 From: Portland, OR Member No.: 106 |
<--- camber challanged. (can only get -.5* out of it right now.)
I wish this stuff could happen to me |
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2004, 03:01 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Seeking round tuits Group: Advanced Members Posts: 5,522 Joined: 24-December 03 From: Kentucky Member No.: 33 |
QUOTE (Dewey316 @ Jul 15 2004, 09:29 AM) <--- camber challanged. (can only get -.5* out of it right now.) I wish this stuff could happen to me I'm with ya, man (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) I've only got -0.8 L / -1.0 R AFTER lowering (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) |
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2004, 03:39 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Apex? What apex? Group: Advanced Members Posts: 245 Joined: 7-January 04 From: Portland, OR Member No.: 106 |
Mine will do it as soon as i change out springs again.
my problem right now is, i am at stock ride height BUT, i have billet strut mounts that are raised 2" above the stock mounting point. once i drop the car back down, I'll get my neg. camber back. (IMG:http://memimage.cardomain.com/member_images/2/web/314000-314999/314283_4_full.jpg) |
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2004, 03:52 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Experienced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 1,197 Joined: 13-February 04 From: Hudson, Colorado Member No.: 197 |
QUOTE (2000Z-71 @ Jul 15 2004, 07:43 AM) What's really sad is when you look at a lowered riced-out Civic and you're envious of the amount of negative camber they have. The sad thing is all those guys do it for is looks and then complain when they wear tires funny. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 15 2004, 04:20 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 128 Joined: 17-March 04 From: Cleveland Member No.: 275 |
yep, I remember seeing a civic that had MORE than -3 degrees of camber, it was crazy!
and seeing the car go over bumps, you can tell it was so stiffly sprung, that it couldnt have leaned over too much to ever get the full contact patch of the tire. i guess thats really what they want though? anyways, -2 or so is about right for me, just need to drive it less on the street. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2004, 12:33 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Advanced Members Posts: 256 Joined: 13-January 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 123 |
QUOTE (bigshoe @ Jul 15 2004, 09:20 AM) yep, I remember seeing a civic that had MORE than -3 degrees of camber, it was crazy! and seeing the car go over bumps, you can tell it was so stiffly sprung, that it couldnt have leaned over too much to ever get the full contact patch of the tire. Not to mention that much camber on his drive wheels must have really limited launches (of course, he's probably happier to spin the tires so much) -Jeff |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd May 2025 - 03:11 PM |