![]() |
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Veteran Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 3,323 Joined: 30-March 06 From: Detroit Suburbs Member No.: 1,144 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Grumpy ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Advanced Members Posts: 2,722 Joined: 1-January 04 From: Bakersfield CA Member No.: 81 ![]() |
You just be me to it! I was just going to post the exact same link! I like the brakes, power, CF, etc. I'm not sure if I like the clear part on the hood. It also looks like they didn't touch the seats????---For $100k they should update the seats! For RR, I'm not sure how good a supercharger is, and I'm not happy to hear of the +200 lbs. over a Z06. I think I'd rather a Z06 with some more N/A HP and those sick 15.5" front brakes! Oh, and the front splitter is welcomed! I feel the same way Dennis about being N/A, I didn't even look at the car becuase of the SC! Put a head and cam(and a few other bolt ons) in a T1 car and beat the crap out of that car for 1/4th the price! Why not a turbo GM? I think the problem with a turbo is packaging. Where do you put it? The SC is nice because it fits 'in' the intake manifold. And for those who haven't seen, the money shot: (IMG:http://picsorban.com/upload/gmgraph.jpg) Wow on the torque curve when compared with the Viper's 8.4L! SC the snake and watch out. Of course, not to hijack the thread, but have you guys seen this:? BadAss LPE 1300rwhp C6 1300rwhp on race gas 1100rwhp on 93 0-200 in 18s Mile 25s @226mph TS (calc) - 300mph DD with A/C, Nav, etc. It looks packaged just fine to me (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/2thumbs.gif) (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th June 2025 - 04:26 PM |