[JimMueller]

What would you pick and why? They show photos of the 350's on track but don't list the track or any specific times. I'd like to see Randy Pobst compare both 350's to the '16 Z28.

"Despite the Z/28's massive torque advantage, it's no quicker than the GT350R. They're pretty close to even—which is exactly what you'd expect given their similar weight-to-power ratios."

http://www.motortrend.com/features/perform...and-camaro-z28/

[79T/A]

The new supercharged Z06's have major heat soak problems, the naturally aspirated Camaros and Mustangs do not. I've personally seen a new Z06 struggle to keep cool during a lapping event in the summer months. Why GM chose to ruin that car with a supercharger is beyond me.

[dailydriver]

The new supercharged Z06's have major heat soak problems
Why GM chose to ruin that car with a supercharger is beyond me.

Could not agree with you more on the above.

Is it totally impossible for them to get more NA power out of the AFM/DOD LT1s, while satisfying the; EPA, CARB, etc.??

If not, then a 550+ HP NA LT1 should be the powerplant in the C7 Z06 (and even the new Z28 again IF that is ever going to happen), with all of the current body work/aero/rolling stock, and even better yet seats, in as LIGHT (and decontented) a package as they can get away with and still be street legal. (IMG:http://www.frrax.com/rrforum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

This post has been edited by dailydriver: Oct 28 2015, 09:36 PM